My reading against Trump

A reading list for understanding the presidency of Donald Trump and its implications for the present and the future

Following Donald Trump’s inauguration as President of the United States, George Orwell’s classic 1984 has skyrocketed to the top of many best-seller lists. The theory and fiction included in this reading list may shed some light on how the U.S. arrived at this point, how we can understand the divisive state of US politics today, and where those of us who object to his presidency can go from here.

1. Plato, The Republic

The Republic provides an understanding for how different models of political power emerge from one another, and how, seemingly, not much has changed in this regard as Plato remarks that “tyranny is probably established out of no other regime than democracy.” This serves as an important reminder that the executive orders Trump has utilised to push through his policies, and too Adolf Hitler’s use of emergency powers, are tools of a ‘democratic’ model of governance.

Read it here.

2. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

In Arendt’s seminal text on totalitarianism, she traces the origins and development of totalitarianism, as well as its inextricable ties with, but also its differences from, fascism. Arendt provides a clear and yet troubling account of the totalitarian elements of Donald Trump’s presidency thus far; most notably in his non-vetted and non-consulted issuance of executive orders. But by also thinking about Trump’s divisive rhetoric and relationship with the judiciary through Arendt underscores how the new President of the United States can be cogently placed as a contemporary manifestation of totalitarian fascism. 

Read it here.

Arendt’s work on the ‘banality of evil’ in Eichmann in Jerusalem is also particularly resonant for our current political climate.

3. Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason

Laclau asks: ‘What drives populism?’ and ‘How are collective identities created?’ His exploration of these questions can offer an understanding of Donald Trump supporters’ identification with his divisive rhetoric, as well as considering how a critical-left populism may be cultivated from the collective anger and opposition felt in response to Trump’s actions.

Available here.

4. Carl Schmitt, Legality and Legitimacy

As a political and legal theorist who worked for the Nazi party, Schmitt was well accustomed to the process of monopolizing political power. In this recently translated text, Schmitt rejects the restraints on liberal constitution, parliamentary democracy, and the rule of law. Legality, he argues, is not necessary for political legitimacy: only a regime with minimal constraints can function and “ensure domestic security in a highly pluralistic society.” That which Schmitt had proposed to help Adolf Hitler consolidate power may be in the process of being realized by Donald Trump. After only a little more than one week in the White House, he has removed many of the existing restraints on authority in a democracy. His sacking of U.S. Acting Attorney General Sally Yates and his recent attacks on individual judges following judgements against his Muslim travel ban provide stark examples of the attempted removal of any constraints and the reincarnation of the Schmittian battle between legality and legitimacy.

Available here.

5. Angela Davis, Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement

After judicial methods of redress are stifled, the only remaining response is a people’s protest. In a collection of essays, conversation, and speeches, renowned activist-scholar Angela Davis writes about the connection between historical struggles for freedom and the struggles and protests in modern-day America. In her words, “Often times there are historical conjunctures that one cannot necessarily predict, but they’re moments when things come together in such a way that new possibilities arrive. And I think that when the Ferguson protesters refused to go home after protesting for two or three days, when they insisted on continuing that protest, and when they were—when Palestine activists, Palestinian activists in Palestine, were the first to actually tweet solidarity and support for them, that opened up a whole new realm.” Davis reminds us of the challenges that confront us in the course of fighting for freedom and provides hope for collective liberation movements. 

Available here.

6. The Anti-Inauguration: Building Resistance in the Trump Era

 “The Anti-Inauguration” includes five speeches that contemplate resistance and future politics in the era of a Donald Trump presidency. It features Naomi Klein, Jeremy Scahill, Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, Anand Gopal, and Owen Jones.

Ebook available for free here.

Two fiction recommendations 

7. Don DeLillo, White Noise

In this brilliant satire, DeLillo discusses how fear is manufactured, impacts upon, and can change a population’s mindset. In this way, DeLillo’s story echoes the engenderment of fear that has served as a bedrock for Donald Trump’s discriminatory and racist rhetoric. But 

Available here.

8. Sinclair Lewis, It Can’t Happen Here

It is 1935 and a charismatic presidential candidate is elected on the back of calls for a new era of prosperity for the country. The protagonist, Doremus Jessop, soon begins to realize however, that the new regime is becoming increasingly authoritarian. This once cautionary tale seems to me to be deeply prophetic of Donald Trump’s presidency, while also highlighting the complicity of those who stand by in the face of such fascism. 

Available here.

For an explicit take on the rise of Islamophobia in modern America, see: Arun Kundnani’s The Muslims Are Coming!: Islamophobia, Extremism, and the Domestic War on Terror. For a more historically-rooted perspective that traces Islamophobia back to the 11th Century, see: look at Deepa Kumar’s Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire.

Please feel free to add other suggestions in the comment box below, or reach out to me on Twitter.

Categories
International AffairsOpinion
Edward Fairhead

Edward is a researcher and teacher at Kent Law School interested in the nexus of law, politics and contemporary war. Edward completed his Master in Law at the University of Kent, in which his thesis compared Obama’s and Bush’s strategies and rhetorical frames used in the war on terror. His research has also addressed the contradictions of the Obama’s administrations supposed humanitarian principles and the failures of its targeting killing programme to adhere to international humanitarian law. He has continued researching in this area for his PhD, focusing in particular on how the US government attempt to legitimize its targeted killing programme.
2 Comments on this post.
  • Gåūråv Tēlgøtē
    9 February 2017 at 4:37 am
    Leave a Reply

    Maholllll

  • Peter Haug
    13 February 2017 at 6:01 am
    Leave a Reply

    A must: “Brave New World”

  • Leave a Reply

    *

    *

    RELATED BY

    • Not for their sake

      On the 6th Of April 2017, US President Donald Trump announced that he had ordered a targeted military strike on an airfield in Syria. The strike is said to...
    • Joint Democracy

      The Tunisian National Security Council, convoked by Tunisian president Béji Caid Essebsi in Carthage on 15th March 2017, talked about terrorism and national security, but also about joints. Indeed,...
    • What if we tackled poverty differently?

      What sort of a society would you like to live in if you knew nothing about where you would end up? Picture yourself in an aware state before your...
    • 6 years of suffering

      As diplomacy is stalled, the humanitarian needs are huge. The death toll is approaching 500,000. 13.5 million Syrians are in need of humanitarian assistance. Of these, 5.7 million are...